Solutions · Procurement & Sourcing

The award went to the lowest price.The rework came with it.

Award rationale, bid criteria and alternate-qualification calls live in email and spreadsheets, so sourcing sees unit price and never the cost of quality. Unifize keeps the evaluation, the evidence and the award on one record quality can read.

RFQ issued with the current spec

Every supplier choice, with its reasons.

The sourcing work procurement, quality and engineering run together, as governed decisions: the criteria, the evidence and who agreed, next to the supplier they chose.

Choosing the supplier

Selection, qualification and the alternate you need before you need it.

  • Supplier Selection and Qualification
  • Emergency Supplier Authorization and Alternate Source Qualification
  • Supplier Quality Management
Supplier records run in the QMS product →

Specifying and approving the part

The spec the supplier builds to, and the proof the first parts meet it.

  • Raw Material and Component Specification Management
  • New Part Approval and First Article Inspection
  • Inbound Inspection and Quarantine
Specifications run in the PLM product →

Ordering

Purchase orders released to suppliers in good standing, and every change agreed.

  • Purchase Order Approval and Release
  • Purchase Order Change Management
  • Shortage and Expedite Management

The award looked cheaper. The cost arrived later.

The failure modes we see inside procurement and sourcing. None of them is a missing feature. All of them are supplier decisions made without the quality record in view.

  1. Sourcing decisions optimise unit price without total quality costPrice is on the sheet. Rework, SCARs and scrap are not.
  2. Supplier requalification cadence drifts without triggerThe list says current. Nobody has reassessed in three years.
  3. Sourcing scorecard refresh stalls without owner accountabilityThe scorecard becomes history, not a current view.
The deck showed price. The cost of quality was never on it.

A supplier chosen on price, paid for in SCARs. That hidden cost is the coordination tax.

Measure your coordination tax →

Award on the whole record, not the unit price.

Most procurement tools record the PO. Unifize holds the award decision itself: the bids next to each supplier's quality history, the cross-functional review and the approver, so the next buyer can see why.

The supplier's whole record, behind every award.

The supplier's quality history, the spec it builds to and the proof its first parts meet it, on the same record as the award.

It sits beside the systems you already run.

Keep the ERP that holds purchase orders, prices and vendor master data. The evaluation, the award and the supplier's quality record run on Unifize, approved with a named signature.

CONTEXTWRITE-BACKARTIFACTSDECISIONSYour systems of recordERPPLMQMSMESUnifizeBid sheets and inboxesSheetsEmailMeetingsDrives

Proof, to the standard you'd hold us to.

A signed baseline, plus the teams who run their supplier and specification work on Unifize, in their own words.

When a supplier choice comes due.

Each of these starts a clock, and each routes into a governed decision, so the sourcing call is made on the record it will be judged by.

Lost bid

Routes to Supplier Quality · owned by Sales · Quality · Engineering · Operations

Alternate supplier qualification delay

Routes to Supplier Quality · owned by Procurement · Supplier Quality · Engineering

Quality agreement negotiation bottleneck

Routes to Supplier Quality · owned by Quality · Procurement · Legal

Award it. Keep the reason.

Bring one real award, a stalled alternate qualification or a quality agreement stuck in negotiation, and see it run on your own work in a 30-minute walkthrough.